Water Board Says: Measure Your Reservoir. How?

The water level loggers are on a rope tied to a buoy, and a raft has to be used to lift and download the loggers.
The logger is at the end of a cable inside a pipe, with the data collector at the top in a NEMA box. The logger is downloaded several times per year at the dam.
The logger is in metal conduit at the bottom of the reservoir. The telemetry unit uploads hourly depths to a website. Data is pulled from the website as often as needed and converted to storage volumes.

Biggest Diverter In The Galaxy!

A white flatbed truck with a cylindrical tank mounted on its back, parked beside a building with a brown garage door.
Table displaying water right search results with columns for application ID, permit ID, license ID, water right type, status, holder name, face amount, county, and action links.
Supplemental statement of water diversion and use for 2013, including monthly rates of diversion in CFS, amounts directly diverted or collected to storage in acre-feet, and amounts beneficially used in acre-feet.
A table displaying monthly data for 'Rate of diversion (CFS)', 'Amount directly diverted or collected to storage (Acre-Feet)', and 'Amount beneficially used (Acre-Feet)', with values represented in large numerical formats.
A close-up view of a Seametrix flow meter displaying a reading of 0.00 GPM, mounted alongside a data logger with various wires connected.

By 2013, she entered a “1” and then held down the “0” key until she filled up each box. For some reason boxes could hold slightly different numbers of digits. She found the limits of what the system could do. I couldn’t stand it: “What happened next?” She says “Well NOW the Water Board noticed, because somebody saw our filing and called a newspaper. The Water Board people were embarrassed so now they were going to do something about it. We ended up in a room full of lawyers in Sacramento telling us how horrible we are, and we’re going to have big fines. I asked one of the lawyers, ‘How big is the leg on this table?’ He said, ‘What? What are you talking about?’ ‘Well, you are asking me how much water we actually diverted, but you can’t tell me how big a table leg is?’ That pretty much ended the meeting. Then there was the hearing, then they said we’d have to pay a $210,000 fine. We said, ‘Fine, you can have the property, it’s not worth that much.’ So they finally reduced it to $10,000 and all of that could be used to install a measurement device and fix our filings.”

An open gray equipment box mounted on a metal pipe, containing a data logger and cables, surrounded by a forest floor covered in fallen leaves and moss.

CalWATRS – improvement or just change?

How is the Water Board’s CalWATRS database working out, and is it an improvement on eWRIMS? In summary, it’s changed, and so far the changes take more of our time to enter and review information. The Initial Statement to enter new water rights is working poorly.

The part of CalWATRS that works well is that there are a few really good folks that work with it, like Jeffrey Parks (Jeff.Parks@waterboards.ca.gov) and Carmen (Carmen.Artrip@waterboards.ca.gov). They and a few others are the most positive aspect of CalWATRS, I think. Jeff and Carmen always get back to me quickly, sometimes the same day. Of course, they want you to initiate all new contacts with CalWATRS-Help@waterboards.ca.gov and not bug people directly.

There was no pilot program with real water right holders before October 1, 2025. It would work much better if it had been tried out with 10 water right holders, including several who are not expert with the use of computers and have just one water right. That is a basic rule for any technology implementation – make it work for a few people first. The Water Board did not do that. Well, there is a possibility that some folks got to preview it, but none of what was learned was applied.

Login page for the California Water Accounting, Tracking, and Reporting System (CalWATRS), detailing system updates and user registration information.

Instead, we ALL got to suffer through it, try things, complain when it failed, and sometimes just wait some days or weeks until it was fixed. So many things were working poorly that I waited until December to start filing annual reports. Our rallying cry is “CalWATRS will work in 2027!” We can only hope.

My experience filing several hundred annual reports for Water Year 2025 is that it takes about 1-1/2 to 2 times as long to file as it did in eWRIMS. The wait between pages is longer for some of the pages, and there are more pages.

When the form is ready to submit, there is a page to review your entered information. However, the page is mostly blank. Don’t worry – I have gone back and reviewed page by page the information, and all the information was usually there.

Once your information is submitted, a PDF can be immediately downloaded, the same as with the old eWRIMS system. The PDFs seem to have all of the entered information. They are harder to read than the eWRIMS forms, and it takes longer to review the information. Next year…hopefully….

A webpage titled 'Initial Statement of Use' from the California Water Boards, featuring a prominent river flowing through a vibrant autumn landscape with colorful trees.

The Initial Statement submittal process is mostly not working:

  • There are no text boxes. There is not even a Supplementary Text Box at the end, somewhere before the signature, in which a user can enter text such as “Please refer to attached map “Real Map Of All Features Of This Water Right.pdf” to see the true map of this water right, including all Places Of Use, Points Of Diversion, Ditches, Measurement Devices, Etc.”.
  • No existing maps can be uploaded and be visible in the Initial Statement.  Maps can only be in attached files.  When submitting paper Initial Statements before CalWATRS’s debut, maps were part of the submittal and were always visible when downloading the Initial Statement.  Existing maps can include many types of relevant information that didn’t fit into the paper forms…and a lot less information is allowed to be entered into CalWATRS compared to the paper forms.
  • No KMLs of polygons can be entered for the Place Of Use.  Digitizing simple Places Of Use works okay, but complex polygons can take significant time.
  • Only one Point Of Diversion can be entered.  Many water rights have more than one POD, so the Initial Statement is inaccurate as soon as it is entered.
  • Only one water source can be entered.  For complex parcels or ranches with multiple water sources, this makes it impossible to list all the actual water sources.
  • Points Of Diversion cannot be edited.
  • Places Of Use cannot be edited.
  • Most of the basemap layers are not working.  For example, the public ownership parcels layer is not working.  I wanted to enter a large Place Of Use polygon using ownership parcels, but there was no information to do that.  Instead of fighting CalWATRS and alternating between Google Earth and CalWATRS for an hour or more, I finally digitized the boundaries of PLSS Sections that contain the Place Of Use.
  • Uploaded maps have to be downloaded to be viewed.  CalWATRS should allow uploading at least one, preferably many existing maps that are viewable within the CalWATRS Initial Statement itself.  The modern Internet can easily handle image files including JPEG, TIF, PNG, BMP, GIF, and so on, as well as Adobe Acrobat PDFs.
  • No Measurement Device can be entered.
  • The CalWATRS Initial Statement entry system as it now exists does not allow water right holders, agents, consulting engineers, or others enter all the required information.  Therefore, many people inputting an Initial Statement will have to lie to sign the document.  One of my Initial Statements allowed only one of 22 Points Of Diversion to be entered at all, and the Place Of Use is only the boundaries of PLSS Sections that encompass the Place Of Use.  I had to sign the document to enter it into the system.  Without even one text box to enter comments, I could not make the document a true representation of the water right. No PDF of the entered information can be downloaded as a draft of what was entered into the Initial Statement.  All that can be given to water right holders to prove an Initial Statement was entered is a cryptic email that does not have the Water Right ID.  This forces a water right holder or agent to log in and go through all the pages just to see what was entered.

Flow calculation Excel sheet for flume hourly data

How do you calculate hourly flows from flumes, weirs, and orifices, when what you actually measure is water depths? That’s how these devices work: the device creates an engineered curve, so that the depth at a certain distance from the entrance or exit gives an accurate flow.

Getting the flow equation is simple enough – for the flume below, flow = 11.6948 * (depth + 0.0068932) ^ 1.64505. What if you divert for seven months of the irrigation season? 7 months * 30 days * 24 hours. That comes to 5,040 measurements – too much to calculate by hand.

A concrete and metal water control structure with a gate and surrounding vegetation, situated in a streamside environment.

You’ll need to use Excel or similar software to handle all the data. Here is an example of a spreadsheet for this flume. Data is copied into the sheet from the water level logger output, then the spreadsheet automatically calculates the corrected depth, flow, and hourly volume.

Why are there columns “Year” and “Month” in this spreadsheet? Those are for pivot tables, which can quickly sum many thousands of rows of data, by year and month. A pivot table is used to get summed monthly flows and the maximum flow for each month, which are necessary to fill out your annual report to the Water Board.

A downloadable Excel file of this example spreadsheet is included at the bottom of this post.

Spreadsheet showing data for the Watchman Briggs 3-Foot Wide, 2-Inch-Ramp Flume, including water depth, flow rates, and calculations from the Hobo MX-2001 Transducer as of April 2, 2026.

Recent stuff – expert witness and added rectified maps

The last 12 months have been interesting. For the first time, I testified as an expert witness in a Superior Court trial. Thankfully I had time to prepare, so questions weren’t a surprise and I had ready testimony and answers. I’ll save details for when the trial is concluded.

Also, I added scanned images and rectified maps to court decrees under the “Some Decrees & Maps” heading on the left sidebar of this blog. The scanned images are higher resolution than the PDF maps and so more detail might be discernable. The rectified maps are in either the Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 10 or California State Plane Zone 1 coordinate systems. GIS software can translate incoming coordinates in one coordinate system, to the one you are working in, so the actual coordinates aren’t much of an issue.

If you are trying to split up decreed water rights in decrees, keep in mind the “(How To) Water Rights Determination and Reapportionment December 14, 2009” document. It is the only written, comprehensive explanation that I have seen which describes how to start with a decree and maps and subdivide water rights for an existing ownership parcel today.

That’s it for now, more later as I work to add posts with useful information.

The Water Bible – Water Measurement Manual

Watermasters, technicians, diverters, and anyone who needs to regulate diversions in the field uses the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Water Measurement Manual. I used this as a watermaster, and I still take it with me on some visits to clients. The manual answers a lot of questions:

What kind of measurement device should I install?

How do I get the flow from my measurement device?

How accurate is my device, and how can I figure that out?

You can buy a hardback version like I have by starting at the webpage https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/mands/wmm.html . You can download a PDF version from https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/mands/wmm/WMM_3rd_2001.pdf . I put a link to the PDF on the left sidebar here, too.

I should have posted this years ago. Better late than never….

My Ditch Is Too Flat / Too Shallow To Measure With a Weir

Write It Down (Or Possibly Lose A Water Right)

I got a call from a distraught diverter.  “My grandfather has irrigated this land since at least 1910, from _______ Creek.  Everyone knew about it at the time, we get 1.2 cubic feet per second for 105 acres of pasture up here.  Nobody was worried about filing on water rights back then, so we didn’t file at the Water Board until a few years ago.  But a new guy moved in next door and he says we don’t have a water right, it’s all his water.  We do have a well but we don’t use it until late in the season when the creek flow drops way down.  The neighbor claims we only use the well and never use the water from the creek.  Then he went and filed a complaint with the Water Board saying we never used water, which is a lie.  We got some letters from the state, we figured they were just the regular reminders and we were really busy.  It turns out one of the letters said the Water Board wanted to come to the ranch and see if we really divert water.  Now we have a letter that says we have to ‘cease and desist’ within 30 days or pay $500 per day fines!  What can we do about this?”

I asked, “Did your grandfather, parents, or you write down notes when you were irrigating?  Do you have photos at the diversion showing you were taking water?  Did you measure the flow somehow?”

“No, we don’t have anything like that.  But everyone around here used to know who used the water!  It wasn’t a problem until there were new owners.”

Have you heard the saying, “Write it down, or it never happened.”?  That is true in everything – conversations, phone calls, purchases, 

From one legal website, here is a list:

What Types of Contracts are Required to be in Writing?   Contracts that are for the transfer or sale of land, are for the sale of goods over $500, cannot be fully completed within one year of signing (according to the contracts terms), are related to marriage, involve a promise to pay another person’s debt (“surety contracts”), or will continue beyond the lifetime of a party performing the contract.

Water rights definitely belong on the list!

When I was a bureaucrat, I learned early on to document the work I was doing, document processes so I and others could do some technical process faster next time, and document all important conversations.  When email came around, I learned to email things to myself to have a record.  Then, 5 or 10 years later when questions came up, I had a dated electronic document to answer with.

So what happened with that diverter who called?  The diverter called the Water Board staffer who wrote the letter and arranged a visit to the property.  I went out and took photos, measured the diversion, put in a temporary measurement device, and wrote a report detailing all that the diverter told me.  Two Water Board engineers visited and wrote up a report.  Then nothing happened for three years.  The diverter is still using water from the creek, and now is measuring the amount of water and reporting it every year.  Hopefully the state won’t take any further action, but we don’t know.

The lesson is, keep records!  Even if something happened 100 years ago, write down now what you know about your water right, the diversion rate, the acreage irrigated, number of livestock.  When a complaint comes, it’s a lot easier to refute when you can just hand over a written account.

Using Circular Headgates as Submerged Orifices

There you go. Based on the change of stem height, you can calculate how much the headgate is open. Convert that to a percentage. For example. A 2.0′ diameter headgate open 0.5′ is 25% open. Then use the table’s 50% row to where it intersects the 2.00 foot diameter column to get an area of 1.913 square feet.

Some Hope For Amendments: SB 389, AB 460, AB 1337