Alternative Compliance Form Soon…Before Aug. 22 Water Board Info. Fair On Meas. & Reporting

The SB 88 Alternative Compliance form is not out yet.  I was promised it would be out before the August 22 Information Fair On Water Measurement And Reporting in Sacramento.  I will be at the Fair – hopefully we’ll get some more information:

  • What kinds of alternative compliance will be accepted?
  • Is the Board going to send out letters, or make phone calls, starting January 1, to all diverters who do not have certified measurement devices?
  • How does the Board see the compliance time frame in 2017?  For example, will diverters be okay if their devices are installed, logging data, and certified, before they start diverting for the season?

I’ll let you know what I find out.  Have a great weekend!

WaterMeasFairFlyerPartPg1_20160822

Save

Why install a WEIR, with cost-effective FLUMES available?

Why would a diverter even think about installing a weir, when cost-effective flumes are available?  It sure would be nice to have just ONE flow measurement device to consider!New_WeirNuway_Flume_Running_Full - Edited

After all, a weir should ideally convey only 1 cubic foot per second (cfs) for every foot of interior width, per the USBR Water Measurement Manual.  For example, the 3′ weir on the left should only convey 3 cfs.

A flume like the Nuway Ramp Flume to the left can convey up to 8 cfs per foot of width.  A weir has to have boards correctly installed, and a flume has no boards.

Flumes can have some drawbacks, though, which is why in ditches with adequate slope, the California Department of Water Resources Watermasters have preferred weirs for 15 years.  A formed-up flume that is poured in place is expensive compared to a prefabricated weir.  The new, prefabricated, galvanized metal flumes will reduce the cost compared to concrete, so cost is not as much an issue today.  Even so, these flumes probably won’t last 20 to 40 years like the older, well-built concrete flumes do.

Flumes have a history of the ditch downstream filling in.  This isn’t the flume’s fault; it was cheaper for a landowner not to do ditch maintenance and over years of neglect, the bottom of the ditch gradually got higher, flooding out the flume a greatly reducing its capacity and accuracy.  Weirs can handle the lack of maintenance better – boards Photo_5566can be stacked up a little higher and still have accurate measurements.

When a flume settles in the ground, or if a galvanized metal flume tips sideways or up- or downstream, its accuracy is seriously affected.  It will only work right if a new calibration curve is developed by measuring flows in the ditch at different elevations within the flume.

However, when a weir settles or tips, boards can be cut so that the top board is still level.  In fact, some settled or worn-out flumes have had weir racks and boards installed inside, to regain accurate flow measurement.  It is not Flume_newly_installed_editedan ideal fix, but it is better than a +/- 30%-accurate flume.

If the ditch is significantly wider than a flume, then a couple of things have to be done to make it work.  First, it has to have wide wingwalls, maybe much wider than the flume itself.  These wingwalls have to be added upstream and downstream.  Then, much more fill has to be used so water caWeir_Showing_Board_Slotsnnot overtop or wear through the fill.  If fill has to be trucked in, that means extra cost and work to install it.

A weir is already wider than a flume, so shorter wingwalls can be used, if they are necessary.  Less fill is needed.  Installation can be substantially less hassle, and less expensive, depending on the ditch and proximity of the property to main roads.

However, in some wide ditches, 2 weirs have been installed side-by-side to measure a larger flow than just one could handle.  And, as Watermasters understood orifices better and worked with them more, they discovered that sometimes, more flow can be conveyed through an orifice than over a weir and still have accurate flow measurement, +/- 5%.

Shawn_sticking_OrificeFinally, weir boards can be cut for a wide range of flows and elevations.  A weir can become an orifice, which may be more appropriate for low flows or variable submerged conditions downstream.

We need both flumes and weirs!  Which one is better, more durable, or more cost-effective, depends on the total diverted flow; width, depth, and slope of the ditch; proximity of the property to road access; downstreamShawn_Profile_Barn_Light_Circle flooding (backing up water) in the ditch, and other factors.  That is what I do for a living: help you get rid of headaches, upset, and trouble, to comply with State law, make sure you are getting your water right, and cut off complaints from other diverters.  The phone call is free to discuss your diversion,  (530) 526-0134, and email is also free at RightsToWaterEng1@gmail.com.

Accurate, Economical Flume for LARGE Diversions

20_cfs_rampflume_stillwell

Photo on the right:  Intermountain Environmental Inc. Nuway Ramp Flume with stilling well, 20 cubic feet per second (cfs) capacity.  Shipped disassembled including fasteners; stilling well not included (but inexpensive to add).

20 cfs irrigates 400 to 2,000 acres of crops, trees, pasture, or hay, depending on where you are.  As a Professional Engineer with wide experience installing and operating flow measurement devices, I can solve your headaches, heartburn, and trouble meeting the Water Board’s Regulations, diverting 20 cfs, for as little as $6,000 with one of these flumes.  These flumes can go in an almost flat ditch, needing a water drop of less than 4″, and still maintaining accuracy of plus or minus 5%, twice what is needed by the Water Board.  Smaller flumes cost less; even larger diversions could use 2 of these side by side.

eTape - EditedFrank Crowe, farmer/rancher and the neighbor of some readers of this blog, has been doing research for 7 months on all possible flow measurement and datalogging devices.  He has found some lower-cost options, including the Nuway flumes, that in past years, I did not think would work well. After checking into them, I know many of these can save Track-it - Editedyou headaches, anguish, trouble, and some money.  Technology has improved and computing costs have come down to make smaller, less expensive data loggers very useful for diversions.  For example, the eTape sensor and Track-It datalogger shown here, and similar equipment from other manufacturers, will work well for many diversions:

Frank checked into the smallest Nuway flume, for 3.5 cfs, and found that the cost is fairly low at $580.  With a size of about 12″ wide, 15″ high, and 48″ long, it will be easy for one person to assemble and would be possible to install by hand, without a backhoe.

Larry Forero, County Director oSWRCB_Alternative_Compliance_Summary - Editedf the Cooperative Extension in Shasta County, has been doing a great job of searching and asking the how diverters can comply with the law economically, particularly through alternative methods.  The “Alternative Compliance” form will be available any day now on the Water Board’s website.  Larry has also been checking on devices, costs, and applicability for particular locations and uses.

Intermountain_Env_Nuway_Flume_Brochure_Photo - Edited

Most diversions will have to comply using standard, accepted methods of measurement and recording data.  Following up on Frank’s reseaIEI_homepage - Editedrch, I contacted Intermountain Environmental, Inc. in Utah and asked Josh Hanks about their 10 cfs and 20 cfs galvanized flumes.   They cost $1,017 and $1,995 respectively.  Shipping would be less than $300. Josh provided detailed information, including how these flumes have performed in the field.  They are designed and built to be plus or minus 5% accurate, well within the Water Board’s regulation of +/- 10% accuracy as certified in the field.  Many installations have worked with soil backfill only, instead of poured concrete.  Installations will probably require a mass-concrete anchor, and may need steel plate inlet wingwall extensions, or outlet wingwalls added.

The bottom line, what does it cost for me to solve your problem, and to purchase, install, attach a datalogger, and certify the device to the satisfaction of the Water Board?  For the largest flume, which can measure up to 20 cfs, in a typical location with vehicle access, I can have these working right, logging data, and certified for you, for $6,000 to $9,000.  Telemetry and/or solar power, if needed or required by the Water Board, could add another $1,000 to $4,000.

Done!  No more headaches, turmoil, or trouble for you, and I will have the pleasure of helping you keeping your business working well.

SB-88 Compliance Information, Nice to Meet Diverters at the NCWA / Farm Bureau / Cattleman Meeting Last Night

Good morning, California diverters.  It was great to meet you folks last night in Hat Creek!  Thank you to Henry and Pam Giacomini and Mark and Debbie Bidwell for inviting me up to the combined meeting of the Northeastern California Water Association, Farm Bureau, and Cattlemen’s and Cattlewomen’s Associations.

This blog is to help solve diverters’ headaches by providing peace of mind and helping stay out of trouble.  Here are some posts aiming to do just that:

Can You Save Some Bucks? Flow Device Economics by CDWR

How Do I Comply With Water Board Regulations? Part 1

How Do I Comply With Water Board Regulations? Part 2

How Do I Comply With Water Board Regulations? Part 3

Can I lose my water right?

Do Something Wrong, Instead Of Nothing!

Working with Regulators, Dealing with Bureaucrats

Demo Measuring Weir and Orifice; & Who To Call At The Board?

The links above will get you halfway to knowing what to do to comply.  The other half is in other blog posts, on water flow measurement devices, how to measure flow, and other topics.  Have a great day and rest of the week!