Solving Diverters' Headaches To Provide Peace Of Mind And Help Stay Out Of Trouble
Category: Measure To Manage
As Chris Reilly says, “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it!” If your diversion takes more than your right, then reducing it may need fast work to keep water on all the land. If you are getting less and don’t know it, that loss comes right out of your pocket.
Good news for folks who want to install, certify, measure and maintain their own devices! AB 589 passed on October 4, and now any landowner, or their lessee or employee, can take the class and do all the required stuff to measure and record his own diversion flows / volumes.
I have not heard what the class dates might be, or whether it is online, and so on. As soon as I do, I will sure put the word out there. Meanwhile, let’s hope for another wetter-than-average winter – abundant water solves most of the demand issues.
Assembly Bill No. 589
CHAPTER 471
An act to add and repeal Section 1841.5 to, the Water Code, relating to water rights.
[ Approved by Governor October 04, 2017. Filed with Secretary of State October 04, 2017. ]
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST
AB 589, Bigelow. Water diversion: monitoring and reporting: University of California Cooperative Extension.
Existing law requires a person who diverts 10 acre-feet of water or more per year under a permit or license to install and maintain a device or employ a method capable of measuring the rate of direct diversion, rate of collection to storage, and rate of withdrawal or release from storage, as specified and with certain exceptions. Existing law requires the measurements to be made using the best available technologies and best professional practices using a device or methods satisfactory to the State Water Resources Control Board. Existing law requires a permittee or licensee to demonstrate to the board at 5-year intervals that a measuring device is functioning properly, as specified.
Existing law authorizes the board to adopt regulations requiring measurement and reporting of water diversion and use by persons including, but not limited to, those authorized to appropriate water under a permit, license, or registration for small irrigation use or livestock stockpond use, or a certification for livestock stockpond use.
This bill, until January 1, 2023, would require any diverter, as defined, who has completed an instructional course regarding the devices or measurement method administered by the University of California Cooperative Extension, including passage of a proficiency test before the completion of the course, to be considered a qualified individual when installing and maintaining devices or implementing methods of measurement that were taught in the course for the diverter’s diversion. The bill would require the University of California Cooperative Extension and the board to develop the curriculum of the course and the proficiency test.
Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: no
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
Section 1841.5 is added to the Water Code, to read:
1841.5.
(a) For the purposes of a device installed pursuant to Section 1840 or 1841 or a method of measurement proposed and adopted pursuant to Section 934 or 935 of Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations, any diverter who has completed an instructional course regarding the devices or measurement method included in the course administered by the University of California Cooperative Extension, including passage of a proficiency test before the completion of the course, shall be considered a qualified individual when installing and maintaining devices or implementing methods of measurement that were taught in the course for the diverter’s diversion. The proficiency test shall seek to certify that the diverter has a satisfactory understanding of the principles of measurement and the use of a measurement method included in the course or the installation of a device. The University of California Cooperative Extension and the board shall develop the curriculum of the course and the proficiency test. The University of California Cooperative Extension and the board shall ensure the course curriculum and the proficiency test do not conflict with any state licensing acts.
(b) For purposes of this section, “diverter” means an individual authorized to divert water under a valid water right, a lessee of property that is subject to a water right who is acting as a representative of the water right holder, or a bona fide employee of the water right holder or lessee.
(c) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2023, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before January 1, 2023, deletes or extends that date.
Recording is the other half of measuring diversions from streams, under the law per SB 88, and per the Water Board‘s water diversion measurement and reporting regulations. Diverters are required by law to measure flows at frequencies based on the volume of water diverted in a year. The flow has to be measured and recorded. Of course many diverters don’t need the data – it costs money and it doesn’t add income…unless a farm or ranch is upgrading for efficiency or to increase acreage What you and I want in all of our purchases is the best value for the money.
We’ll look at 5 different water level logging options. The total cost given does not include installation – that adds $200 and up. Certification for the logger and the measurement device itself, by a professional, required for all but the smallest diversions, costs $300 and up if you have Rights To Water Engineering do the work.
Vegetronix Aqua-Plumb Water Level Sensor connected with the Logger-8-USB ($400 per diversion, less if diversions are very close to one another – with tax and shipping, about $500 per diversion)
Onset Hobo U20L-04 Water Level Logger ($600, less for multiple diversions; with tax, shipping, and data shuttle, about $1,050 for the one diversion, $1,400 for two….)
Global Water WL-16 ($1,000; with with tax, shipping, and cable, about $1,450 per diversion)
In-Situ Rugged Troll 200 Data Loggerand Tube 300 Telemetry System ($1,200 – less for multiple diversions, plus $1,300 for each telemetered diversion. With tax, shipping, and cable, about $1,600 per diversion, and with telemetry and add-ons, about $3,300 for one diversion)
PMC Versaline VL4511 – WLS-31 ($1,370 per diversion; with the cable, tax, and shipping, about $1,800 per diversion)
This is a long post since it is hard to summarize something this technical so here isthe bottom line: my top recommendation is the last of five in this post – for most diverters.
SWRCB Measurement and Recording Requirements for 2017 (diverters exempted where Watermaster reports)
For very small diversions, flows have to be recorded monthly or weekly. That is easy to do as long as someone goes to the diversion at least once a week.
Photo credit: globalw.com
For medium-sized diversions, flows must be recorded daily. This is possible, but it doesn’t allow for the owner or employees to have time off, travel, and so on. At this level of recording, an automatic recorder of some type is necessary. Large diversions must be recorded hourly, and automatic recording is the only practical way to be sure flows are recorded.That is the subject of today’s post: automatic recording of flows, or what is really done most of the time, recording water levels and using equations to calculate the flow.
We will leave aside the discussion of propeller, acoustic Doppler, magnetic, and other in-line meters. If you have a diversion that goes through a long length of straight pipe, one of these devices can be bolted in or strapped on. This post is about open diversions into a ditch, where an instantaneous measurement device (weir, orifice, flume) already exists. These open devices do not measure flow directly, they measure the water level. An equation is used to convert levels to flows after data is downloaded.
There are hundreds of devices (ready to go) and components (connected parts) to measure water levels. There are also hundreds of loggers that collect data. Here, we will look at 5 water level sensors connected to data loggers, called water level loggers.
THE FIRST is a setup that rancher and retired aircraft engineer Frank Crowe has been working on. Frank’s desire is to save him and his neighbors money, so he has been working with theVegetronixAqua-PlumbWater Level Sensor connected with theLogger-8-USB. Together these are $340, which is
the least cost of anything that I have seen. With this you will have all the
parts you need for moderately durable, reliable, and accurate water level logger. Not only that, but the Logger-8-USB has 8 channels altogether, so a diverter could measure up to 8 water levels at once by adding 7 more sensors at $95 apiece. Wiith tax and shipping, this costs about $500 per diversion)
Here is Frank’s latest setup with his comments: “Finally was able to put together a prototype package for the Vegetronix sensor. The box is a little bigger than needed, but seems to work. I’m trying to get the data to download into something I can analyze, but it seems to work very stable.
The pipe is 3/4″ mounted to the box, with the sensor wire going down to about an inch from the bottom and then returns up over 12″, therefore doubling the sensitivity. The end is held by some wire at the moment, but would probably work better with a stainless steel spring. The top of the pipe is not sealed, but should be to keep the humidity out of the box. Of course if the data logger were in a separate box, the seal would not be necessary.
To exercise the thing, it is stuck into a 3″ pipe with a water drip going in and a drain at the bottom. The overflow hole is 13″ above the bottom.”
So, what is the trade-off? If you are handy, somewhat experienced with electronic components, and willing to spend some hours, you can set this up yourself. Frank can help a few of his neighbors, but he has his family and ranch requiring his time, too. Otherwise, it is going to cost a couple hundred dollars or so for someone to set this up for you. It needs to be checked, maintained, and adjusted more often than the integrated water level loggers, too, so the maintenance and downloading cost can be $50 to $100 per year if everything is working well.
SECOND, theOnset Hobo U20L-04 Water Level Loggeris $300 before shipping and tax. The DWR Groundwater folks I worked with for years, use these in groundwater wells. They are easy to set up – program one and place it in a stilling well. Take it out once or twice a year to download the data. The battery life is 5 years, maybe more.
Why aren’t these automatically the cheapest option?They may be the cheapest if a diverter has 3 diversions or more, or several neighbors are using the same Hobo U20L-04.However, they are not vented, meaning that as atmospheric pressure changes due to low pressure areas and storms, the device’s pressure reading will not be as accurate. Therefore Onset recommends having a second U20L-04 set up outside the water to measure the pressure change over time. The second device can be some miles away, so one outside calibration device could be used for several in the water within a 300-square-mile area.
What I heard from colleagues is that these did not last for 10 years, and sometimes not for five years, although the device is being improved over time. Durability and reliability of a device are important for uninterrupted data, and therefore compliance with the Water Board’s regulations. The more often a device has to be replaced, the more it costs over time.
In summary, the cost of Onset Hobo U20L-04 devices is $600. This cost may be reduced somewhat if the cost of a calibration device can be shared between several diverters, or several diversions. With tax, shipping, and data shuttle, the delivered cost for all parts is about $1,050 for the one diversion, $1,400 for two….)
THE THIRD device discussed here is theGlobal Water WL-16. This is an integrated, vented device, designed to program and set in a pipe. Watermasters have used these for years at various diversions.
The WL-16 has a stainless steel casing and is fairly tough. They should last a good 5 years. The problem is at the sensor end – it is relatively easy to clog up in warm-water conditions, with algae and/or silt. In cool flowing water, it might operate for the whole irrigation season. In warmer or still water, it will have to be checked and sprayed clean every 1 to 3 months. Watermasters have put the sensor ends in distilled water in baby-bottle bags, and rubber-banded the tops of the bags closed to keep the sensors clean for the entire irrigation season.
One other concern which I have not discussed with the manufacturer – the manual for the WL-16 was updated in 2009 and refers to Windows XP, not the current Windows 10. I am sure that a newer manual is sent out with the device when it is purchased. Overall, with some care to check the sensor end and clean it as necessary, this is a great drop-it-in-and-turn-it-on option. The cost for a WL-16 is $1,000; with with tax, shipping, and cable, about $1,450 per diversion.
THE FOURTH device, the In-Situ Troll, has the advantage of out-of-the-box options for telemetry. The Groundwater folks at the Department of Water Resources have used these and a couple recommend these for the right application. The In-Situ
The Troll 200 Data Logger can run independently without telemetry, or be attached to the Tube 300R Telemetry System. The Troll 200 is non-vented, so like the Onset Hobo data loggers mentioned above, an extra unit is needed for air pressure to correct the water level (pressure) recorded by the unit in the water.
The total unit cost for 2 Troll 200s, a Tube 300R, and accessories, is about $2,900. This is not cheap, but it is a lot less than a full-on gaging station with satellite radio, which costs $12,000 and up for components, and over $2,000 to install in easy locations. Telemetry is expensive, there is no way of getting around that fact. In summary, the cost for 2Troll 200s is $1,200 to log a diversion – each additional, nearby diversion costs only another $600. Telemetry addes $1,300 to the cost of parts for each telemetered diversion. With tax, shipping, and cable, using Troll 200s costs about $1,600 per diversion, and with theTube 300Rtelemetry and add-ons, the total parts cost is about $3,500 for one diversion)
The Tube 300R requires a separate phone number for each water level logger, and cell service. In-Situ offers the option of $35/month web hosting, on its HydroVu Cloud Data Services Plan. This cost is in addition to the Tube 300R, cell phone service, and installation.
THE FIFTH and final water level logger discussed here is thePMC Versaline VL4511 – WLS-31Water Level Datalogger. This looks much like the WL-16, but instead of a silicon bladder at the end of sensor, it has a non-fouling ceramic sensor.At $1,370 before tax and shipping, it has the highest purchase cost of the 4 listed in this post, but it is my recommendation for durability, reliability, and low maintenance.
The Versaline is made for wastewater; in other words, for sewer lines. The datalogger end is vented and it is not supposed to be submerged, same as the Vegetronix components and the WL-16. However, it is made to put inside manholes where it is very warm and humid. The PMC guys have maintained the sensor end in rough environments with the equipment lasting 8 to 12 years. If the sensor gets completely covered with algae (or something worse), it still works. It can be cleaned off with a toothbrush if it seems so clogged it might prevent water from getting to the ceramic end. The data logger and sensor are fairly new but are improvements on the older, long-lived versions.
The VL4511 – WLS-31is three times the cost of the least-expensive option. However, it might be the least expensive in the long run…it sure is the most worry-free of all the options listed here! In summary, the VL4511 – WLS-31 costs about $1,370 per diversion; with the cable, tax, and shipping, about $1,800 per diversion.There are many, many choices for logging water levels. These are the ones I would install, either because I, my colleagues at DWR, or larger farms or ranches have used them; or because I have checked with other users. One of these choices can serve you well!
When you call and ask, “What do I have to do to stay out of trouble with the Water Board?”, my reply is usually, “What’s your diversion or pond like? How much and what type of water right(s) do you have? When can I come and take a look at it?” We’ll figure out a time, and I’ll visit for 2 hours or however long it takes to see how your diversion works, or how your pond fills and empties, and think of a few likely solutions.
Then I will write up an evaluation and proposal. The proposals are good enough that, if you don’t choose me to install or certify it, then you, another engineer, or a contractor knows how to get the job done can install it and keep you out of trouble. Of course, I would like the whole job, but you do have choices!
So, what does an evaluation and proposal look like? Here is an example, just for a single measurement device for one diversion:
In this post I am highlighting the McCrometer Mc Mag 3000 flow meter for pipelines. I don’t have a lot of detail here, so I will update this a couple of times before mid-February.
Most of the flow measurement devices I have talked about in this blog are for use in ditches, and include weirs, orifices, and flumes. These devices are the standard lower-cost devices that are relatively easy to install. All of these devices require a separate, specially installed data collector to record stage (water surface elevation) so flow can be computed from the data.
What if your flow already runs through a level length of pipe? You have many, many options from manufacturers. There are propellor, magnetic, and acoustic meters, with integrated data collectors, that bolt up or strap on. Most magnetic and acoustic meters require external power, but some run on batteries, and an increasing number have battery options. Within a few hours any full pipeline that is straight and level, and has 10 to 20 pipe diameters of straight pipe upstream of the meter, and 10 pipe diameters downstream of the meter, can have one of these devices installed and operating.
Note the “level and full” restriction – there are meters that can handle sloped and/or partly full pipelines, but they are more expensive. Usually it is less expensive to insert (or add to the end) a section of level pipeline that will always be full.
What do these cost? I have not asked about every possible pipe diameter, but I think the cost range for 4″ to 12″ pipes is around $1,400 to $3,000, before tax, shipping, and installation costs. That’s a reasonable price for a quick-to-install device that measure up to about 5 cfs in a 12″ pipe. McCrometer even has a “how-to” video on their website, for the physical part of the installation.
What if you have a larger pipeline? The SonTek-IQ may be a better solution – the pipe version of this flow meter and data logger can handle pipes as small as 18 inches in diameter, up to 16 feet (!). This is an acoustic Doppler meter, rather than magnetic sensing with the McMag 3000. There is an open channel version of the IQ, too, which installs in the bottom of a canal.
For larger or more irregular channels, Sontek-SL, which is a side-looking acoustic Doppler. the SonTek acoustic equipment is a costlier solution for small-diameter pipes – the cost range for the SonTek equipment is $8,200 to $9,200. For a larger pipe, canal, or natural channel up to 66 feet wide, this is a very cost-effective solution. We’ll talk more about the SonTek equipment in later posts.
Thank God for all the rain and snow! As of today, California is still having record rainfall and a near-record snowpack, through February 2. Have a good night, all.
My friend Steve Beall in the far north of the state brought something to my attention, regarding my comparison of four water level loggers (five with the In-Situ Troll 200 added). I listed only the component costs, and not the data cable, data shuttle (Hobo), software, PVC/galvanaized pipe, or installation. Good point, and thanks for suggesting that I address all costs, Steve. The five loggers detailed farther on down in the post are, with component costs only, data transfer, installation, and certification not included:
Vegetronix Aqua-Plumb Water Level Sensor connected with the Logger-8-USB ($400 per diversion, less if diversions are very close to one another – with tax and shipping, about $500 per diversion)
Onset Hobo U20L-04 Water Level Logger ($600, less for multiple diversions; with tax and shipping about $700)
Global Water WL-16 ($1,000 per diversion, about $1,100 with tax and shipping)
In-Situ Rugged Troll 200 Data Loggerand Tube 300 Telemetry System ($1,200 – less for multiple diversions, plus $1,300 for each telemetered diversion…about $2,500 for one diversion; with tax and shipping about $2,800 per diversion)
PMC Versaline VL4511 – WLS-31 ($1,370 per diversion, about $1,500 with tax and shipping)
The additional components you will need if you want to download and process your own data are: a customized data cable (or shuttle for the Hobo), and software. These add $250 to $350. You also need a laptop, except for the Hobo, unless you temporarily remove the other loggers to download them on your desktop at the house. Shipping and taxes will add $70 to $350, depending on which equipment and the location where it ships from. Electronic tools and equipment, and various testers are useful, sometimes necessary, to chase down problems. Extra connectors and wire might be needed – keep at least a simple kit. Installation can cost $200 and up, depending on the difficulty, need for vandalism protection, access, and so on. Certification by a professional, required for all but the smallest diversions, costs $300 to $500 if you have Rights To Water Engineering do the work.
***** ORIGINAL POST, with a couple of edits:
Recording is the other half of measuring diversions from streams, under California’s new water diversion measurement and reporting regulations. Diverters are required by law to measure flows at frequencies based on the volume of water diverted in a year. The flow has to be measured and recorded. Of course most diverters don’t care about the data – it costs money and it doesn’t add income…unless a farm or ranch is upgrading for efficiency or to increase acreage What you and I want in all of our purchases is the best value for the money.
This is a long post since it is hard to summarize something this technical so here isthe bottom line: my top recommendation is the last of five in this post – for most diverters.
SWRCB Measurement and Recording Requirements for 2017 (diverters exempted where Watermaster reports)
For very small diversions, flows have to be recorded monthly or weekly. That is easy to do as long as someone goes to the diversion at least once a week.
Photo credit: globalw.com
For medium-sized diversions, flows must be recorded daily. This is possible, but it doesn’t allow for the owner or employees to have time off, travel, and so on. At this level of recording, an automatic recorder of some type is necessary. Large diversions must be recorded hourly, and automatic recording is the only practical way to be sure flows are recorded.That is the subject of today’s post: automatic recording of flows, or what is really done most of the time, recording water levels and using equations to calculate the flow.
We will leave aside the discussion of propeller, acoustic Doppler, magnetic, and other in-line meters. If you have a diversion that goes through a long length of straight pipe, one of these devices can be bolted in or strapped on. This post is about open diversions into a ditch, where an instantaneous measurement device (weir, orifice, flume) already exists. These open devices do not measure flow directly, they measure the water level. An equation is used to convert levels to flows after data is downloaded.
There are hundreds of devices (ready to go) and components (connected parts) to measure water levels. There are also hundreds of loggers that collect data. Here, we will look at 5 water level sensors connected to data loggers, called water level loggers.
THE FIRST is a setup that rancher and retired aircraft engineer Frank Crowe has been working on. Frank’s desire is to save him and his neighbors money, so he has been working with theVegetronixAqua-PlumbWater Level Sensor connected with theLogger-8-USB. Together these are $340, which is
the least cost of anything that I have seen. Add shipping, tax,
and $60 in other parts and batteries, and for $450 you’ll have the parts you n
eed for moderately durable, reliable, and accurate water level logger. Not only that, but the Logger-8-USB has 8 channels altogether, so a diverter could measure up to 8 water levels at once by adding 7 more sensors at $95 apiece, not including tax and shipping.
Here is Frank’s latest setup with his comments: “Finally was able to put together a prototype package for the Vegetronix sensor. The box is a little bigger than needed, but seems to work. I’m trying to get the data to download into something I can analyze, but it seems to work very stable.
The pipe is 3/4″ mounted to the box, with the sensor wire going down to about an inch from the bottom and then returns up over 12″, therefore doubling the sensitivity. The end is held by some wire at the moment, but would probably work better with a stainless steel spring. The top of the pipe is not sealed, but should be to keep the humidity out of the box. Of course if the data logger were in a separate box, the seal would not be necessary.
To exercise the thing, it is stuck into a 3″ pipe with a water drip going in and a drain at the bottom. The overflow hole is 13″ above the bottom.”
So, what is the trade-off? If you are handy, somewhat experienced with electronic components, and willing to spend some hours, you can set this up yourself. Frank can help a few of his neighbors, but he has his family and ranch requiring his time, too. Otherwise, it is going to cost a couple hundred dollars or so for someone to set this up for you. It needs to be checked, maintained, and adjusted more often than the integrated water level loggers, too, so the maintenance and downloading cost can be $50 to $100 per year if everything is working well.
SECOND, theOnset Hobo U20L-04 Water Level Loggeris $300 before shipping and tax. The DWR Groundwater folks I worked with for years, use these in groundwater wells. They are easy to set up – program one and place it in a stilling well. Take it out once or twice a year to download the data. The battery life is 5 years, maybe more.
Why aren’t these automatically the cheapest option?They may be the cheapest if a diverter has 3 diversions or more, or several neighbors are using the same Hobo U20L-04.However, they are not vented, meaning that as atmospheric pressure changes due to low pressure areas and storms, the device’s pressure reading will not be as accurate. Therefore Onset recommends having a second U20L-04 set up outside the water to measure the pressure change over time. The second device can be some miles away, so one outside calibration device could be used for several in the water within a 300-square-mile area.
What I heard from colleagues is that these did not last for 10 years, and sometimes not for five years, although the device is being improved over time. Durability and reliability of a device are important for uninterrupted data, and therefore compliance with the Water Board’s regulations. The more often a device has to be replaced, the more it costs over time.
In summary, the cost of Onset Hobo U20L-04 devices is $600 plus tax and shipping. This cost may be reduced somewhat if the cost of a calibration device can be shared between several diverters, or several diversions.
THE THIRD device discussed here is theGlobal Water WL-16. This is an integrated, vented device, designed to program and set in a pipe. Watermasters have used these for years at various diversions. They cost about $1,000, before tax and shipping.
The WL-16 has a stainless steel casing and is fairly tough. They should last a good 5 years. The problem is at the sensor end – it is relatively easy to clog up in warm-water conditions, with algae and/or silt. In cool flowing water, it might operate for the whole irrigation season. In warmer or still water, it will have to be checked and sprayed clean every 1 to 3 months. Watermasters have put the sensor ends in distilled water in baby-bottle bags, and rubber-banded the tops of the bags closed to keep the sensors clean for the entire irrigation season.
One other concern which I have not discussed with the manufacturer – the manual for the WL-16 was updated in 2009 and refers to Windows XP, not the current Windows 10. I am sure that a newer manual is sent out with the device when it is purchased. Overall, with some care to check the sensor end and clean it as necessary, this is a great drop-it-in-and-turn-it-on option.
THE FOURTH device, the In-Situ Troll, has the advantage of out-of-the-box options for telemetry. The Groundwater folks at the Department of Water Resources have used these and a couple recommend these for the right application. The In-Situ
The Troll 200 Data Logger ($595) can run independently without telemetry, or be attached to the Tube 300R Telemetry System ($1,320). The Troll 200 is non-vented, so like the Onset Hobo data loggers mentioned above, an extra unit is needed for air pressure to correct the water level (pressure) recorded by the unit in the water. The cable and software for the Troll 200 are about $375.
The total unit cost for 2 Troll 200s, a Tube 300R, and accessories, is about $2,900. Tax, shipping, and installation willadd $600 and up, depending on location, elevation, and the length of the dirt road going in; and difficulty at the site and vandalism potential will add costs, too. $3,500 + for telemetered water level logging is not cheap, but it is a lot less than a full-on gaging station with satellite radio, which costs $12,000 and up for components, and over $2,000 to install in easy locations. Telemetry is expensive, there is no way of getting around that fact.
The Tube 300R requires a separate phone number for each water level logger, and cell service. In-Situ offers the option of $35/month web hosting, on its HydroVu Cloud Data Services Plan. This cost is in addition to the Tube 300R, cell phone service, and installation.
THE FIFTH and final water level logger discussed here is thePMC Versaline VL2111 – WLS-31Water Level Datalogger (replaced by the same-priced, updated model: PMC Versaline VL4511 – WLS-31). This looks much like the WL-16, but instead of a silicon bladder at the end of sensor, it has a non-fouling ceramic sensor.At $1,370 before tax and shipping, it has the highest purchase cost of the 4 listed in this post, but it is my recommendation for durability, reliability, and low maintenance.
The Versaline is made for wastewater; in other words, for sewer lines. The datalogger end is vented and it is not supposed to be submerged, same as the Vegetronix components and the WL-16. However, it is made to put inside manholes where it is very warm and humid. The PMC guys have maintained the sensor end in rough environments with the equipment lasting 8 to 12 years. If the sensor gets completely covered with algae (or something worse), it still works. It can be cleaned off with a toothbrush if it seems so clogged it might prevent water from getting to the ceramic end. The data logger and sensor are fairly new but are improvements on the older, long-lived versions.
The VL2111 – WLS-31is three times the cost of the least-expensive option. However, it might be the least expensive in the long run…it sure is the most worry-free of all the options listed here!
The PMC guys had to make a change in the sensor, so now the recommended setup is the PMC Versaline VL4511 – WLS-31 Water Level Datalogger. It will cost the same and be as durable. Regarding the reason for the change, Bob Foster at PMC wrote: “This system will come with our VL4511 level sensor and not the VL2000 that we initially spoke to you about.
The reason for the change is the VL2000 required slightly more power than what is available through the datalogger battery, so we decided to provide an upgraded sensor model, which uses much less power.
This upgraded sensor, our VL4511 also has the advantage of using:
An all-welded Titanium housing, which has a 5-year corrosion warranty
Significantly smaller diameter
Additionally, it still has anti-clog features near the sensing element to ensure reliability.”
There are many, many choices for logging water levels. These are the ones I would install, either because I, my colleagues at DWR, or larger farms or ranches have used them; or because I have checked with other users. One of these choices can serve you well!
A question I often hear is, “Hey, I got this letter/a call from the State Water Resources Control Board. What am I supposed to do about measuring my flow?” The main number for the Water Board is (916) 341-5300 – and these folks have much more work to do than time to do it. Several calls may be required to reach a knowledgeable person who isn’t already talking to two telephone calls, or making three investigations in the field. So, start with the main contact, Paul Wells, who is very knowledgeable and can get you the answers or the person you need to talk to.
By the way, Thank You to Kathy Mrowka, who has been reasonable in working with diverters who are trying to comply. What she says often is true: talk with her and/or others at the Water Board and you’ll likely get consideration, some more time to comply, and reduced (maybe greatly reduced) fines.
Since many calls I get are about enforcement letters, calls, or visits from the Board, it’s probably most useful to have the phone numbers and emails from Enforcement Program Staff. Here they are, from the Water Rights Enforcement Program Web Page:
You have read the articles – California’s water rights are WAY more than the average annual runoff! The system is broken! Agriculture is to blame – gosh, those capitalist farmers and ranchers are using precious water to make…Food! Wood! Paper! Clothing! Flowers! A living, even Profits! It’s obvious that I am using sarcasm; larger corporate farms notwithstanding, it’s not a big income-earning concern. More people are leaving farms and ranches for easier work schedules and stable incomes, than are getting into farming.
“On some major river systems, especially in the parched San Joaquin Valley, the over-allocation is jaw-opening. On the San Joaquin River itself, people have rights to nearly nine times more water than flows down from the Sierra. On the Kern, it’s six times. On the Stanislaus, four.
“Water rights exceed average natural runoff on 16 major rivers, UC Davis researchers found last year. And they were only counting so-called junior rights — those granted after 1914, the last time the Legislature updated California’s convoluted water allocation system.
Based on the actual, not theoretical, effect of these water rights, we should be saying, “So what?” Why is that, you ask? For very good, practical reasons, as detailed here.
Decreed (adjudicated) surface water rights usually have maximum amounts, and reductions in supply are addressed by the decree specifying that lower priorities must shut off diversions first. If all are the same priority, then everyone shares the losses by taking the same percentage reduction in flow. Surplus flows can be diverted under many decrees, not under others, but availability of surplus diversions usually means flows are higher than average, and anyway they come earlier in the season, before flows drop in the summer. The great majority of these rights are for agriculture, which either feeds you and me, or is sold outside the State and adds to our economy and government coffers. I say, Who cares? Limits on the use of these water rights are forever in place!
Riparian water rights have correlative shares of the available water…and reduced supply means riparian diverters must reduce diversions correlatively. Sure, riparian diverters can divert as much as they can use reasonably and beneficially, according to the California Constitution, Article X, Section 2. But, So what? Who cares? The acreage with riparian rights decreases every single year, as parcels with riparian rights are split. The resultant parcels not adjacent to the stream no longer have riparian rights, except in the very rare case of a landowner getting an attorney’s help to deliberately reserve riparian rights on newly split parcels.
What about appropriative rights? Think about it this way: pre-1914 appropriative water rights were maximized in…1914! As World War I was starting, when the population was about 3 million compared to today’s 39 million, there were no more pre-1914 rights. Regarding these senior water rights, So what? Who cares?
“Aha!”, say some, “You forgot that groundwater is making up all the shortage! And that all comes from surface water!” Yes, and in 2014, the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act was passed to address exactly that. It will take some years, but withdrawals will be more stable, by law, in years to come. There would not BE groundwater deficits if surface water could get around the Delta as it originally did with SWP and CVP. It is not for lack of money in the past to pay for pumps or even the planned peripheral canal, and it is not for the lack of technology to move the water. It is for environmental reasons that the planned volume of water does not make it to the San Joaquin Valley. But, that’s a subject for some later post.
Let’s be really absurd, and imagine that in California, the amount of water rights issued isONE MILLION TIMES the average annual runoff!!! If the average annual runoff is 70 million acre-feet, the water rights are now 70 Trillion, 70,000,000,000,000 AF Per Year!Let’s all run around with our hair on fire! But, what does this really mean?
If we have the same reservoirs for storage, then no more can be stored. If there is half the runoff in a drought year, farmers, ranchers, cities, manufacturers, and other human users can still only capture and use a certain amount. Having no more plumbing – reservoirs and canals – means a lot of water is still going to be in streams, and making it to the Pacific Ocean. That’s “environmental” water for fisheries and other aquatic species.
If we have a record wet year, same thing. Humans can still only capture and use what the plumbing allows. A much higher percentage of water is available for non-human, environmental uses. Same Plumbing = Same Maximum Water Use, regardless of water rights.
Let’s flip the argument around and imagine a California in which the average annual runoff is five times the water rights. Put another way, total water rights are only one fifth the average annual runoff. What would the State look like then?
This would be a lot closer to the non-human, environmental paradise imagined by the left-leaning populations of our densely-populated cities. Scale back agriculture by a factor of 5, and then the rest of the State economy with it. We would look more like a larger New Mexico, maybe a Colorado, than we do today. And our 39 million residents? We would have more like 8 million, as we had in World War II. So, which 4 out of 5 choose to leave the State to bring about this flora and fauna utopia for the 1/5 that are left? What, nobody is volunteering to leave California, and donate their property to the Sierra Club, to make this greater environmental national monument happen?? I didn’t think so.
Angry Neighbor Larry Lucifer – Photo Credit: PixabayMark and Sally Saint Family – Photo Credit: Pixabay
Sally Saint was convinced that her neighbor, Larry Lucifer, has been stealing water. She didn’t want to make an enemy of Larry but that may be impossible since Larry gets angry easily, has lots of opinions, and tells everyone else what they should do. Sally called the California Department of Water Resources Watermaster Supervisor, and he gave her detailed advice. So, what did Sally do with that advice?
Sally called the Water Board in Sacramento and found that Larry and she have a riparian water right. Larry has been filing Statements of Use for the ditch, including for the Saint’s and others’ parcels that get water from the ditch. As far as the Board knows, Larry is the sole owner of the water right.
In Version 1 of this saga, Sally went over to talk to Larry, said that she thinks the Saints are not getting their right, and Larry threatened to take legal action and then kicked her off the property. Mark and Sally ended up placing their own pump in the creek and avoiding Larry.
Today, in Version 2, Sally went over on Saturday and said hello to Larry. She even brought fresh-baked cookies. He was grumpy but willing to talk about irrigation from the Greig Ditch. After a few easy questions, Sally asked, “Larry, can you help me understand the water rights on Rowdy Creek?” Smart – this is an open question and gives Larry a chance to show how smart he is.
“Well, my grandparents and parents always said these are riparian rights. I don’t know if there is an amount. I know my property has riparian rights but you don’t anymore.”
Sally nodded. “Okay, thanks for explaining that. Your family owned all this once and if anyone still understands it’s you. I appreciate you sending water through the ditch to us so we can irrigate, even if we don’t have a right.”
Larry nodded and said, “Well, you guys might still have a water right. Or you could pay me for more. I’ll sell it to you for $1,000 per acre-foot. That’s a pretty good price. I do all the work at the diversion, and ditch work, and you guys don’t pay anything. You haven’t even offered to help.”
Backhoe Cleaning Dry Ditch, Photo Credit: Pixabay
Sally looked surprised and said, “You know, you’re right, Mark and I never even thought about that. You do the work every year, and we really appreciate it. We would like to help so you don’t have the whole load. Can we rent a backhoe every other year and clean out the ditch? I’ll help you at the dam – I know you build it up every year and put plastic in.”
Watermaster In His “Field Office” – Photo Credit: Pixabay
Larry thought about it. “Well, yeah, you should be doing the work, too. So, what’s the problem? Why did you come over here, anyway?”
“We really want to understand our water rights. If there was a way we could keep the pasture green a little longer, say, through August, that would really help.”
“Well Sally, I’m not even sure you have a water right. But if you do half the maintenance, or pay something for me to do it, then as long as I get my water I don’t care what goes down the ditch to you guys. You can go raise up the dam a little if you want more, too, just let me know if you are coming on my property.”
Sally thanked Larry again for helping her to understand. She left while she still had a “win”, since she had a solution to get her water. Since the Watermaster had spent time giving advice, she called back to let him know how it turned out.
The Watermaster explained: “Hey, that’s great, Sally! Well done, you tamed the tiger a little bit and it sounds like you will get your water next year. You have a
Putting In Larry’s Rock Dam, Photo Credit: Pixabay
riparian right, correct? Remember that riparian rights are undefined – per the California Constitution, it’s whatever you can apply reasonably and beneficially, without wasting it. As the flow drops in the stream you have to share the loss with other riparian diverters. As a rough idea, you might have the full right through June 15 or 30, and by the end of August, maybe half, and the flow pops back up again at the end of October. If nobody is complaining to you or Larry, you could raise or seal up your dam a little more in July to keep ditch flows a little higher.
The end of Version 2 of this story is that Sally talked with Mark, and he was pretty happy that they had an agreement with Larry. They agreed that they should tread lightly and not talk with neighbors and others about it; if it got back to Larry he might get mad about the gossip and really mess with their flows!
What have you experienced – a Version 1, Version 2, or something else? Please let us know in a comment!
Angry Neighbor Larry Lucifer – Photo Credit: PixabayMark and Sally Saint Family – Photo Credit: Pixabay
Sally Saint was convinced that her neighbor, Larry Lucifer, has been stealing water. She didn’t want to make an enemy of Larry but that may be impossible since Larry gets angry easily, has lots of opinions, and tells everyone else what they should do. Sally called the California Department of Water Resources Watermaster Supervisor, and he gave her detailed advice. So, what did Sally do with that advice?
Sally called the Water Board in Sacramento and found that Larry and she have a riparian water right. Larry has been filing Statements of Use for the ditch, including for the Saint’s and others’ parcels that get water from the ditch. As far as the Board knows, Larry is the sole owner of the water right.
Sally went over on Saturday and said hello to Larry. She even brought fresh-baked cookies. He was grumpy but willing to talk about irrigation from the Greig Ditch. After a few easy questions, Sally asked, “Larry, how do I know what my water right is?”
“I don’t know, it’s your job to figure it out for your property.”
Sally tried another tack: “I noticed that your field stays green through August, and mine starts drying up in July. I don’t know if this is correct, but it seems like maybe our field is getting less than our water right. What do you think?”
“Dang it Sally, I make sure some water gets to you. Do you have a way to measure it? I don’t, and you don’t, so how the heck do you know you are not
Backhoe Cleaning Dry Ditch, Photo Credit: Pixabay
getting your full water right? Besides, I clean out the ditch and keep it flowing with my backhoe, my fuel, my time, and I never ask you for help.”
Sally was a little embarrassed. She had not thought about the work Larry did that helped her family out; she was getting to ready to acknowledge Larry’s help and tell him thanks when Larry barked, “You know what, Sally, I learned long ago don’t do anybody any favors. My mistake for not making you pay your part. Why don’t you get off my property, and I’ll have my attorney contact you. If that’s not good enough I’ll get a court restraining order. How about that? I’m not sure how much water is going to make it down the ditch next year. Now leave and don’t come back.”
Sally left, boiling mad and flabbergasted. What did she do wrong? Should she just forget it? Were there really jerks like this, who you can’t talk to? Sally went home and fumed, and then called the Water Board to demand some answers. What were her rights, and how did she figure them out? She couldn’t get anyone on the phone who would take the time; the Water Board was way too busy enforcing the SB 88 deadlines for measurement device installation. Sally called back to the Department of Water Resources in Red Bluff and talked to one of the Watermasters. She explained everything that had happened.
Watermaster In His “Field Office” – Photo Credit: Pixabay
The Watermaster explained: “Yeah, I’m sorry Sally, sometimes that’s the way it goes. You have a riparian right, correct? Well riparian rights are undefined – per the California Constitution, it’s whatever you can apply reasonably and beneficially, without wasting it. You can’t ship it off your property, but you could use it anywhere, for any crop, livestock, and short-term storage less than 30 days. As the flow drops in the stream you have to share the loss with other riparian diverters. As a rough idea, you might have the full right through June 15 or 30, and by the end of August, maybe half, and the flow pops back up again at the end of October.
“You do have a right to maintain your ditch. However, that doesn’t mean a neighbor won’t sue, which costs money and time no matter what. If it were my place, I don’t think I’d walk on your neighbor’s land without permission.
“Hey, here’s an idea. There’s no reason you couldn’t divert your flow from your
Pump – Photo Credit: Pixabay
own diversion. Yes, you’re right, you would have to pump it, since the creek is a little downhill of where it would need to get onto your place. The pump will cost a few hundred, plus some hundreds in sprinkler lines, plus some power cost each year, and right now you get the water for free with gravity. But if you wanted, you could avoid dealing with your neighbor on water. Oh, and since you would be pumping, think about putting in sprinklers to keep it efficient.
“Another thing to think about – what if he gets mad and cuts off the water completely? You could see a lawyer and take it to court, and it would be decided once and for all. But, a court action is very expensive, whether you win or lose, and you never know how a judge is going to decide. Having your own pump might be a lot less expense and hassle in the long run.
“At least you have the option of your own diversion; think about people who aren’t riparian and aren’t getting their water. They have to complain to the Water Board, or hire an attorney, and maybe even sue in court!
“I wish I had a better answer for you. Right, ‘water’s for fighting, whiskey’s for drinking,’ as the old saying goes. As you’re seeing now, sometimes water just seems like an excuse to carry on an argument. Putting in a pump might be your best option. Call back if you have any questions, okay? I hope it works out well in the end.”
The end of the story is that Sally talked with Mark, and she was careful not to talk about her neighbor at the salon – gossip spreads like fire in a small town. Mark and Sally decided to put in a small pump, some pipe, and some small sprinkler lines. That way, they would not have to deal with Larry at all, and they would make sure to irrigate all the pasture.
Next time we’ll look at Version 2 of the end of the story. Could things turn out differently, depending on how Sally approached Larry? We’ll see!
It was getting hard for ME to go back and find the posts I had written, so I added a Table Of Contents (TOC) to the left menu bar. As of this date, there are 86 posts! I like to put work into standard, documented procedures to simplify life and make it easier for me to do the same thing next time, and for the next person in my job to pick it up quickly. Why did I wait this long to do a simple TOC?
I wrote 5 times this much verbiage in emails as a bureaucrat, so it is not lack of ability. Of course most of my State emails were for everyday work and coordination. Little of it had public interest.
In this blog, though, every post is of interest to a few thousand water right holders. The TOC lets you scroll through every post at your leisure and pick out the titles you are most interested in today. Tomorrow you’ll have a different question, and the TOC and blog posts will still be here for your use.
Do you have a question or an idea you do not see in the TOC? Let me know and I’ll publish a post about it!
On the How Do I? page, I picked out the burning questions and the posts that provide the best answers. When I received phone calls in the Watermaster job from which I recently retired, this lookup format was most useful in helping someone solve an immediate problem.
Is there a water rights issue or flow measurement problem you can’t find an easy answer for? Let me know and I will write a post, then include the link on this page, too!